Відео

beyer diss was out of left field lol

Someone need to integrate these RiscV cores into a CPU and there is none. We have some SoC and micro controllers with it, but no desktop nor server class around to make a product or two. Also, as long as there is no Windows for it, there is no desktop anyway as Linux is not a thing in that space.

I like that Framework is branching out beyond just Intel and AMD. I was wondering if it would be ARM or RISC-V that got there first, but considering their open nature I'm not surprised it was RISC-V. Since it's open source and people can mess around with the architecture a bit, I think it would be cool if someone did a laptop where it had both an ARM CPU for everyday low power tasks like web browsing and watching UA-cam, but also had a RISC-V CPU for more compute heavy tasks like video editing, gaming, or 3D modeling. Basically an ARM based laptop for good battery efficiency, but with a RISC-V co-processor for when you needed a little extra processing power.

Dude you nailed it with koss as I’m listening on kph30i’s w a zen dac watching my Plex server update 😂 6TB external

Potato

you could put that RiscV board in a Cooler Master chassis that Framework worked with, hopefully

Why no quater inch connection?

Which tubes did you buy exactly?

While I LOVE the concept of Framework launching a JH7110 mainboard, I've got a StarFive 2 (which uses the same CPU). The JH7110 benches out somewhere between a BCM2837 and a BCM2711. It works for VERY light web browsing and word processing. It might be "adequate" for UA-cam, but really, you're boiling down to users having a negative user experience. I'd much rather see them go after SpacemiT's K1 (from the DC-ROMA Laptop II) or something equivalent or better. I love the RISC-V architecture, and really want it to get a fair shake. Which means I don't want the whole ISA to be seen as inferior when the problem is with an older, underpowered, development CPU.

That’s quite interesting. I had to google a lot of those terms to find out about the headphones I just bought

Hello fellow RISC-V and umami enthusiast...

For IEMs i would say it depends. The fit must be PERFECT especially if you use foam tips. This is really hard to do if the tips colapse in your ear (which ive had trouble with recently). Fitment and therefore comfort is a huge factor. For headphones that's really not much of a problem.

Wait a minute … how does it sound. Can we change the headband? Does it respond well to EQ. Where do you stick the tubes. 😂

Apple used to be a big proponent of RISC architecture but then they abandoned it for some reason. Now they jumped on the ARM bandwagon. Anyway, it is interesting for it to come back to spotlight again. It also brings memories of SGI workstations and Amiga computers. 🙂

I have had a FrameWork 16 since May 1st. Running Linux Mint.

To everyone who is planing on buying this headphones, you can use this headphones for mix and mastering but only with EQ CORRECTION, otherwise its a big no, high end and seperation between mid and high frequencies will destroy your mix i am telling you this with experience, i have the 80ohms version end i am using a sound profile and they are good, my mixes sound good on every device.That's my honest review and real opinion about them.

single sided driver vs double sided which one is better? and does it matter?

I was hoping Framework would launch an ARM version, but this is even better! Long live RISC-V!

Did you fully switch from your Macbook to the Framework laptop?

As a dev I'm not sure it's good for FE work

Let me know when it can run Linux Mint. 8o)

What CPU architecture will be the first implemented in graphene? 6502, z80, risc-v?

So beautiful...

Thank you!

Nice line. The laptop of thesius. 😂

This video seems off.

hopefully it has a UEFI bios, getting really tired of uboot and serial tty’s

Presumably would be running open source firmware? In which case I'm in.

I think I have tinnitus yet I have always done my best to protect my hearing. Never been to a concert, always wear hearing protection when doing anything that creates loud noise. Even when I was a kid, my dad always made sure I have hearing protection on. I don't even listen to music loudly. Thanks for this video, I wonder if maybe I just simply didn't have good enough hearing protection throughout my life, and I've always wondered about using the in-ear as well as over-ear protection.

Framework and RISC V in one video, let's goooooo!

Interesting why you didn't turn on to let see how it performs?

How did this happen before an arm main board? Oh yeah, cause you don't have to license anything.

too expensive so it's a no-no

More framework content plz 😅

Wow, didn't think u would make a laptop video, that too on framework, and u are a linux boy as well, and that too Fedora

The Umami Shirt!

Frame generation and branch prediction are nothing alike, I'm not sure why that comparison was made. And no, what's limiting processors is not CISC vs RISC, the decode portion of chips are fairly small, it's stuff like instruction scheduling and the like. Don't forget x86 is "RISC" internally and has been for decades. There's also the issue of RISC requiring more instructions to perform the same work, so CISC is essentially compressed machinecode that is decompressed-on-the-fly to get both small code size and fast performance.

Risc-v was designed for the intention of making it easy for CPU designers to develop niche chips without the burden of not having a software ecosystem. It's versatile enough to be used as a general computing platform though it's not going to measure up. It's really expensive for a chip to be manufactured at the most efficient fabs and a niche chip design is not going to get produced in scale to compete in performance.

I love the concept of framework so much I am basically willing to put my money where my mouth is but I hate supporting that POS linus

I have been very interested in buying a RISC-V SBC devboard for some time now, but have yet to see one with 16Gb of ram. If this is forward looking tech they better have the bare minimum specs for today. 2, 4, 8Gb main memory is 10+ years ago specs. of course that's just my opinion.

I'm given to understand CPU instruction decode complexity contributes more to the RISC advantage over CISC than ease of branch prediction. The primeagen did a good video on this 'X86 Needs To Die' with Casey Muratori. RISC-V is less encumbered with intellectual property BS than x86 or arm but it can still have some proprietary stuff tacked on to a given SOC. For more detail checkout Andrew Katz's talk: 'Free and Open Source Licensing and RISC-V'

DMS! Thanks for posting this video

Will you make a video about Music/Audio on linux, could be interesting for people who have not the best hardware and want to move on from Windows?

laptop of Theseus - I like that. planning to by the RISC-V version when it comes out

How much faster is Risc-V than the Risc of Arm?

I love my passively cooled, completely silent Macbook Air M2, and I'm very much looking forward to something with similar performance and power efficiency coming to the PC market. I don't necessarily love all of the decisions that Apple makes and would prefer to support a company that is more pro-consumer, but the performance and efficiency deficit between the Apple M Series and any x86-64 chip from the likes of Intel or AMD is simply too great to overlook right now. If Framework were to release a main board with a RISC based CPU that is on par with the M2 in terms of performance and efficiency, is passively cooled, and has good software support from the Linux developers, then I am sold.

I'll never get the PC38x audiophile train.. HD560s and Tygr are WORLDS superior for gaming wtf

vaporwave. you got me lol

I wish there was more products like this. I don't own a Framework laptop. but my phone is Fairphone. It is build with exactly the same goals and principles. In case of the phone not so much upgraded, but repairability. Fairphone does not release hardware upgrades very often, but the spare parts are available and they are very cheap. And software support is very long term. Which is amaxing in the age of planned deprecation.

I'd love to watch n actual showdown between the AMD Framework and the Meteor Lake Framework.